ETHICAL CRITERIA WHEN A (POTENTIAL) PERPETRATOR ASKS A HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION TO DEFEND THEIR CASE BASED ON THE FORENSIC DOCUMENTATION OF ALLEGED TORTURE. HOW SHALL WE PROCEED?

Ethical criteria when a (potential) perpetrator asks a human rights organization to defend their case based on the forensic documentation of alleged torture. How shall we proceed?

Objective Discuss the ethical Mens Shirts dilemma of perpetrators requesting clinical evaluations intended to prove persecution or torture.The discussion is organized around three real cases.Method We present three cases of plausible perpetra- tors, partially amended to protect anonymity.The paper presents a review of the complex ethical challenges

read more

PARALLEL BETWEEN THE REFUGEE CONCEPT ACCORDING TO THE CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES FROM 1951 AND ITS PROTOCOL FROM 1967 AND THE REFUGEE CONCEPT ACCORDING TO EUROPEAN LAW

In this study our aim is to make a comparison between the refugee concept according to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees from 1951 and its Protocol from 1967 which represent the international approach and the refugee concept according to European Law ( the EU Treaties, EU Directives, the Dublin Regulation).This parallel will present

read more

Enhancing national progress and sustainable economic development among Al-Majiri children in Northern Nigeria

Al-Majiri is an itinerant or traditional Islamic educational system commonly known in the Northern part of Nigeria for cultivating spirituality and inculcating morality prior to colonialism.The prevalent street begging by the Al-Majiri children has not contributed to sustainable economic development because of lack of vocational training and entrep

read more